Academic Regulations for the Bachelor’s Degree Programme in Classical Archaeology (2010)
Contents

1. Framework provisions of the academic regulations

2. Structure of the programme

3. Individual disciplines and examinations in the programme

4. Procedural provisions of the academic regulations


1. Framework provisions of the academic regulations


The academic regulations for the Bachelor’s degree in classical archaeology (2010) were prepared by the Board of Studies at the Department of Anthropology, Archaeology and Linguistics and approved by the Dean of the Faculty of Humanities on 6 June 2010.

The academic regulations come into effect on 1 September 2010.

The Bachelor’s degree in classical archaeology entitles the holder to use the title of Bachelor of Arts (BA) in Classical Archaeology.

The programme is assigned to the body of external examiners for classical archaeology.
The academic direction and primary subject areas of the programme
The aim of the Bachelor's degree in classical archaeology is to give the student academic knowledge and an overall understanding of the antique culture and history of the Mediterranean countries from 1000 B.C. up to and including Emperor Constantine the Great (306-337 A.D.). The student is introduced to the scientific disciplines of the subject, and gains theoretical and methodological qualifications which enable him/her to identify, formulate and solve complex classical archaeological issues independently. The Bachelor's degree programme qualifies the student for admission to the Master's degree programme in classical archaeology.
Academic skills and qualifications

A Bachelor’s degree with a core subject in classical archaeology gives the student the following qualifications and competences:

Knowledge:
• A clear overview of the material relics and history of the antique culture of the Mediterranean countries from 1000 B.C. up to and including Constantine the Great
• Knowledge of ethical issues and modern issues relating to cultural heritage
• Knowledge of humanistic and scientific theoretical schools of thought and issues
• General knowledge of the characteristics of the material relics of different cultures, and ability to analyse problems related to meetings between cultures
• General understanding of source-critical assessments of written as well as of material sources
• General understanding of the use of artefacts as a source material for cultural analysis

Skills:
• Skills in applying methodologies of the subject, such as typology, classification, dating methods, iconography, stylistic and picture analysis on a given object, as well as in analysing issues related to the material relics of Antique culture
• Fundamental understanding of the subject of classical archaeology, both theoretically and practically
• Skills in data collection in various subject areas
• Skills in information searching
• Skills in the verbal and written communication of academic information to various target groups
• Ability to apply archaeological methodologies in fieldwork, and understanding of the underlying theories; as well as skills in digital record keeping

Competencies
• The ability to structure and understand a given set of information, and to extract the most important points
• The ability to analyse scientific issues
• The ability to collaborate- for instance, in association with field projects- in a multidisciplinary and often international environment
• The ability to carry out work independently, and to structure one's own learning
• The ability to work methodically, and to apply methodologies and theories critically

Authority
Executive Order No. 814 of 29 June 2010 regarding Bachelor's and Master’s degree programmes at universities (Education Order), Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, see https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=132698
Admission requirements and prerequisites
Admission to the Bachelor's degree programme is in accordance with Executive Order No. 32 of 29 January 2008 on admission etc. to Bachelor’s and Master’s degree programmes at universities (Admissions Order), Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, see http://www.au.dk/da/regler/2008/bek32.pdf
This study programme gives access to:
The Bachelor’s degree programme in classical archaeology is sufficient for admission to the Master’s degree programme in classical archaeology at Aarhus University. Furthermore, it is possible to qualify for enrolment at other Master’s degree programmes at Aarhus University and other institutions by taking a supplementary subject in the third year of the Bachelor’s degree programme.
Transfer regulations
Transfer of ECTS credits from the 2007 to the 2010 academic regulations is assessed individually in accordance with the following guidelines:

Introduction to Classical Archaeology (15 ECTS) transfers to Introduction to Classical Archaeology (15 ECTS)
Information Searching (5 ECTS) transfers to Information Searching (5 ECTS)
Cultural History of Antiquity (10 ECTS) transfers to Introduction to Antiquity (10 ECTS)
Greek Sculpture (10 ECTS) or Roman Sculpture (10 ECTS) or Greek Topography and Architecture (10 ECTS) or Roman Topography and Architecture (10 ECTS) transfers to Material Culture (10 ECTS)
Greek Sculpture (10 ECTS) or Roman Sculpture (10 ECTS) transfers to Sculpture in the Antique Societies (10 ECTS)
Greek Topography and Architecture (10 ECTS) or Roman Topography and Architecture (10 ECTS) transfers to Topography and Architecture in the Antique Societies (10 ECTS)
Excavation, Theory and Practice (10 ECTS) transfers to Excavation, Theory and Practice (10 ECTS)
General Studies (10 ECTS) transfers to General Studies (10 ECTS)
Greek Ceramics (10 ECTS) transfer to Greek Ceramics (10 ECTS)
Theme (10 ECTS) transfers to Theme (10 ECTS)
Primary View (10 ECTS) transfers to Primary View (10 ECTS)
Bachelor's Project (15 ECTS) transfers to Bachelor's Project (15 ECTS)


2. Structure of the programme

Overview of exams -
Module/annual exam + Final exam Exam title/type of examination Subject type/marking Semester/ECTS
Introduction to Antiquity Introduction to Antiquity Constituent and mandatory First semester
Annual/final exam Internal examination with internal co-examiner Pass/fail (10 ECTS)
Introduction to Classical Archaeology Constituent and mandatory First semester
Annual/final exam Internal examination with internal co-examiner Marked (15 ECTS)
Information Searching Constituent and mandatory First semester
Annual/final exam - Internal exam marked only by examiner Pass/fail (5 ECTS)
Material Culture and Archaeological Practice Material Culture Constituent and mandatory Second semester
Internal examination with internal co-examiner Marked (10 ECTS)
Excavation, Theory and Practice Constituent and mandatory Second semester
Annual/final exam - Internal exam marked only by examiner Pass/fail (10 ECTS)
General Studies General Studies Constituent and mandatory Second semester
Internal examination with internal co-examiner Pass/fail (10 ECTS)
Greek Ceramics Greek Ceramics Constituent and mandatory Third semester
External examination with an external co-examiner Marked (10 ECTS)
Sculpture in the Antique Societies Sculpture in the Antique Societies Constituent and mandatory Third semester
Internal examination with internal co-examiner Pass/fail (10 ECTS)
Elective Subject ('Hum-fag') Elective Subject ('HUM-fag') Elective Subject Third semester
- Marked (10 ECTS)
Topography and Architecture in the Antique Societies Topography and Architecture in the Antique Societies Constituent and mandatory Fourth semester
External examination with an external co-examiner Marked (10 ECTS)
Individually Chosen Theme Individually Chosen Theme Constituent and mandatory Fourth semester
Internal examination with internal co-examiner Marked (10 ECTS)
Primary View Primary View Constituent and mandatory Fourth semester
External examination with an external co-examiner Marked (10 ECTS)
Bachelor’s project Bachelor’s project Constituent and mandatory Fifth semester
External examination with an external co-examiner Marked (15 ECTS)
Supplementary Subject Supplementary Subject Fifth semester
- (15 ECTS)
Supplementary Subject Sixth semester
- (30 ECTS)



Box diagram -
First semester Second semester Third semester Fourth semester Fifth semester Sixth semester
Introduction to Antiquity
10 ECTS










Introduction to Classical Archaeology
15 ECTS















Information Searching
5 ECTS





Material Culture
10 ECTS










Excavation, Theory and Practice
10 ECTS










General Studies
10 ECTS










Greek Ceramics
10 ECTS










Sculpture in the Antique Societies
10 ECTS










Elective Subject (HUM-fag)
10 ECTS










Topography and Architecture in the Antique Societies
10 ECTS










Theme
10 ECTS










Primary View
10 ECTS










Bachelor's Project
15 ECTS















Supplementary Subject
15 ECTS















Supplementary Subject
30 ECTS































Regulations and guidelines for academic progress -
The student may only register for the examination in Excavation, Theory and Practice after passing the examinations in Introduction to Classical Archaeology and Information Searches.

In order to enter for the exam Bachelor’s Project, the student must have passed 18 months of study (90 ECTS points) in the first two years of the Bachelor’s degree programme.

3. Individual disciplines and examinations in the programme
Introduction to Antiquity
Through academic work within the module's disciplines, the student will acquire the following:

Knowledge:
• A general knowledge of fundamental methods in classical archaeology, types of material, typological and stylistic development, era classification, and significance of material culture
• A general understanding of historical and social relationships and contexts in Antique societies, including the political development from tyranny to democracy and from Hellenistic kingdoms to Emperors
• A general understanding of the relationship between history, archaeology and literature in the different periods

Skills:
Skills in applying fundamental archaeological methodologies
• Skills in the use of I.T. and academic databases for literary and information searches
• A sound overview of a large volume of complex information, and the ability to refer to this knowledge
• The ability to examine and describe an item or monument objectively, and to date and interpret it
• The ability to carry out literary and information searches using I.T. and academic databases, and to evaluate the scientific applicability of the source

Competencies:
• The ability to apply fundamental archaeological methods
The module consists of the following exam(s):
1. Introduction to Antiquity
Aim:
In the evaluation of exam performance, the examinee must display a general knowledge to antique culture, including the relationship between material relics, literature, history and social conditions.
Method of instruction:
Instruction is mainly in the form of lectures.
Language of instruction:
Danish
Course description:
The course introduces the student to the main topics in the history of Antique culture, from approx. 1000 B.C. up to and including Constantine the Great. On the basis of historical frameworks and periods, an overview is provided of the society of antiquity, including the political development from tyranny to democracy and Hellenistic kingdoms to the imperial age in both the Greek and the Italian regions. Focus is on factors such as written communication, including the origins of writings, various literary genres and the overall relationship between literature, art and archaeology.
METHODS OF EVALUATION
1.
Examinees Product Scope of product Duration Preparation Materials permitted Basis
Individual Written Set examination 4 hour(s)
None Submission
Supervision: yes Computer: -
Note
Entry for the the examination requires active (including written and
verbal presentations), regular and satisfactory participation in the
teaching (min. 75% of the available lessons).
A syllabus of 1100 pages in length is set by the subject teacher. Examination is in the form
of a set written exam. The assignment consists of a minimum of four
and a maximum of six questions based on the syllabus.


2. Introduction to Classical Archaeology
Aim:
In the evaluation of exam performance, emphasis is placed on the extent to which the student
• Documents a general knowledge of the periods, styles, typology and classifications involved in the subject
• Has a knowledge of criteria for dating
• Can apply methodology in description, monument analysis and information searching
Method of instruction:
Instruction is in the form of lectures and dialogue based on course books and articles.
Language of instruction:
Danish
Course description:
The discipline gives a general introduction to key monuments in Greek and Italian/Roman archaeology from 1000B.C. up to and including Constantine the Great. Emphasis is placed on chronology, style and typology, and an introduction is given to key archaeological history and fundamental methodology in object and monument description, criteria for dating and classification. Students are also provided with knowledge of important areas such as Athens, Delphi and Olympia; Rome, Pompeii and Ostia.
METHODS OF EVALUATION
1.
Examinees Product Scope of product Duration Preparation Materials permitted Basis
Individual Oral Set examination 30 minutes

Presentation
Note
Entry for the the examination requires active (including written and
verbal presentations), regular and satisfactory participation in the
teaching (min. 75% of the
available lessons).

Syllabus 1500 pages.
The oral examination takes the form of the depiction of 4-6 monuments,
objects or building plans from throughout the period,
based upon the syllabus.


3. Information Searching
Aim:
In the evaluation of exam performance, emphasis is placed on the extent to which the student
• Documents knowledge of methods used in classical archaeology, with emphasis on searching for information, including an explanation of the procedure used when searching for information
• Can produce a description of a given monument
Method of instruction:
Instruction is mainly in the form of exercises in class.
Language of instruction:
Danish
Course description:
The aim of the discipline is to provide the student with the necessary tools for the use of I.T., and the ability to critically evaluate the acquired information. Students are also given an introduction to important academic databases.
METHODS OF EVALUATION
1.
Examinees Product Scope of product Duration Preparation Materials permitted Basis
Individual Written Set examination
1 week(s) Usual Submission
Note
Entry for the the examination requires active (including written and
verbal presentations), regular and satisfactory participation in the
teaching (min. 75% of the
available lessons).

In association with the instruction, a short written home assignment
on a set classical archaeological topic is submitted
(syllabus 100 pages)
Scope: max. 3 pages
The student must find literature for the assignment independently,
and the method used to find this literature must be stated.


Material Culture and Archaeological Practice
Through academic work within the module's disciplines, the student will acquire the following:

Knowledge:
• Knowledge of ethical issues and modern issues relating to cultural heritage
• Knowledge of problems related to the excavation and interpretation of material culture as a whole
• Knowledge basic archaeological methods in relation to selected localities and their finds
• Knowledge of investigations in the field and methods of reconnaissance

Skills:
• Skills in treating different types of material culture
• Knowledge of basic procedures at an archaeological excavation, including principals for surveying archaeological excavations
• Skills in writing reports in association with excavations (in English if necessary)
• Knowledge of the principles and procedures of field work, including reconnaissance
• Skills in categorisation and interpretation of different groups of monuments and excavated materials

Competencies:
• The ability to solve practical tasks, both independently and as part of a group
• The ability to take part in multidisciplinary projects with limited time frames.
The module consists of the following exam(s):
1. Material Culture
Aim:
In the evaluation of exam performance, emphasis is placed on the extent to which the student
• Has knowledge of problems related to the excavation and interpretation of material culture, as well as of ethical issues and modern issues relating to cultural heritage
• Has a knowledge of the chosen topic
• Is able to apply basic archaeological methodologies
Method of instruction:
The instruction is based on lectures, exercises and dialogue.
Language of instruction:
Danish
Course description:
The discipline gives an introduction to problems related to the excavation and interpretation of material culture in selected locations, e.g. private, public or religious. The chosen topic can include all types of material culture, from ceramic to sculpture and small-scale art, and can be from within Greek or Roman culture, or cover more than one culture. The discipline also includes an introduction to different archaeological field investigations and methods of reconnaissance, and to ethical and modern issues related to cultural heritage.
METHODS OF EVALUATION
1.
Examinees Product Scope of product Duration Preparation Materials permitted Basis
Individual Oral Set examination 30 minutes
None Presentation
Note
Entry for the the examination requires active (including written and
verbal presentations), regular and satisfactory participation in the
teaching (min. 75% of the
available lessons).

A syllabus of 1000 pages in length is set by the subject teacher. Pictorial material
based on the syllabus is supplied at the examination, and the
examinee must identify and interpret this.


2. Excavation, Theory and Practice
Aim:
In the evaluation of exam performance, emphasis is placed on the extent to which the student
• Has knowledge of the principles and procedures of field work, including reconnaissance
• Knowledge of principals for surveying archaeological excavations
• Is able to carry out basic measurements and data recording tasks independently
• Is able to perform basic practical procedures at an archaeological excavation.
Method of instruction:
The instruction is divided into two parts:
a) A course in measurement based on practical exercises
b) A course in excavation based on full participation in an archaeological excavation. The course is taught as a whole module in the second half of the semester.
Language of instruction:
Danish or English
Course description:
The course examines archaeological field studies primarily from a technical and formal perspective. The investigation as a physical, technical activity comes into focus, with students learning at the same time that the work results in scientific data, that excavations are part of the research process, and that they affect the result.
METHODS OF EVALUATION
1.
Examinees Product Scope of product Duration Preparation Materials permitted Basis
Individual - - 4 week(s)

Attendance
Note
The examination consists of active, regular and satisfactory participation in the
discipline. Active means that the
student participates in the activities associated with the teaching programme. Regular
participation means that the student attends at least 75% of the
lessons offered on a regular basis. Satisfactory participation is documented via the submission of a
short report (max. 5 pages) on the excavation, with preliminary
interpretation. The report is produced at the end of the excavation
course.
A syllabus of 1000 pages in length is set by the instructor.


General Studies
Through academic work within the module's disciplines, the student will acquire the following:

Knowledge:
• General knowledge of the university as an institution, including the historical and present status of the humanities as an institute of learning, science and culture, and the connection to social and natural sciences.
• General knowledge of common philosophical, theoretical and analytical issues related to scientific knowledge in research and in the general public
• Insight into selected theoretical positions and issues that play a key role in the scientific debate in archaeology
• General knowledge of ethics in science
• Knowledge of the key characteristics of the history of archaeological theory

Skills:
• The ability to critically and constructively assess scientific issues.
• Skills in identifying the theoretical and methodological prerequisites for scientific issues
• Skills in reflecting on the relation between theoretical schools of thought and areas of academic focus within archaeology

Competencies:
• The ability to assess and comment on scientific methodologies and traditions
• The ability to reflect on the relevance and role of the humanities in modern society
The module consists of the following exam(s):
1. General Studies
Aim:
In the evaluation of the written examination, emphasis is placed on the extent to which the student meets the following requirements:
• Can demonstrate insight into and the ability to analyse key theoretical issues relating to the subject
• Is able to give a correct and satisfactory account for the issue in question
Method of instruction:
Teaching is primarily in the form of lectures.
Language of instruction:
Danish and/or English
Course description:
The course is taught alongside the courses in Anthropology and Ethnography, Prehistoric Archaeology, Classical Archaeology, Middle Age and Renaissance Archaeology and Linguistics. The course is divided into two parts: The joint programme (approx. 2/3 of the complete course) examines general issues common to humanities, historically and culturally. The remaining 1/3 takes place in subject-specific classes (Anthropology, Archaeology and Linguistics, respectively), where emphasis is placed on the analysis of specific scientific positions and issues related to those subjects. This last part of the course will concentrate mainly on the history of archaeological theory, including relationships between archaeology in different regions and foreign influences on theory. The aim of the course is to give the student an understanding of changes in the focus of the profession through history, and the ability to reflect on distinctive regional characteristics and the integration of international schools of thought.
METHODS OF EVALUATION
1.
Examinees Product Scope of product Duration Preparation Materials permitted Basis
Individual - -


Attendance
Note
The examination requires active and satisfactory participation in the teaching.

Detailed provisions: Students must submit two assignments,
relating to the general and subject-specific parts respectively.
The topic must be approved by the instructor. Both assignments can be completed
individually or in groups (max. 3 students), however,
individual assessment of all sections of the assignment, except
for the hypothesis and the conclusion,
must be possible. It must therefore be indicated on the assignments
which section each individual student is responsible for.
The assignment must treat a topic of own choice, based on the
syllabus and approved by the instructor. The length for each sub-assignment
for individual completion: Max. 5 pages; for groups of 2
students: Max. 8 pages; for groups of 3 students: Max. 11
pages.


Greek Ceramics
Through academic work within the module's disciplines, the student will acquire the following:

Knowledge:
• Knowledge of research into Greek ceramics from the period approx. 1000-30B.C.
• Knowledge of topics such as technique, work places, vase measurement, motives, Greek mythology, production and trade
• Knowledge of issues such as regional characteristics and local imitation

Skills:
• A fundamental understanding of the significance of Greek ceramics as a source material for Greek culture
• Confident application of methodologies such as style analysis, typology, iconography and picture analysis
• The ability to distinguish between regional ceramic traditions
• Confidence in the use of terminology related to the study of Greek ceramics
• The ability to see the significance of ceramics for the dating of other materials and monuments, as well as its significance for relative chronology

Competencies:
• The ability to communicate academic material verbally
The module consists of the following exam(s):
1. Greek Ceramics
Aim:
In the evaluation of exam performance, emphasis is placed on the extent to which the student
• Has a general understanding of Greek ceramics and vase painting in the Geometric period through to the end of the Hellenistic period (circa 1000-30B.C.).
• Has a command of the methodical approach to Greek ceramics, and a knowledge of stylistic periods, dating criteria, vase artists and mythology.
Method of instruction:
Instruction is in the form of lectures and dialogue based on course books and articles. Students give a verbal presentation on a defined topic within Greek ceramics in association with the instruction. The presentation can be made individually or in groups.
Language of instruction:
Danish
Course description:
The discipline covers key monuments in Greek ceramics and its stylistic periods from the Geometric period until the end of the Hellenistic period (circa 1000-30 B.C.), with emphasis in figure-decorated ceramics. Emphasis is placed on a fundamental introduction to specific methods used in Greek vase painting, as well as stylistic analysis, typology and iconography. The discipline also encompasses an introduction to mythological topics, technique, work places, vase painting, production and trade, with issues relating to regional characteristics playing a central role.
METHODS OF EVALUATION
1.
Examinees Product Scope of product Duration Preparation Materials permitted Basis
Individual Oral Set examination 30 minutes
None Presentation
Note
Entry for the the examination requires active (including written and
verbal presentations), regular and satisfactory participation in the
teaching (min. 75% of the
available lessons).
A syllabus of 1000 pages in length is set by the instructor. Literature
relating to the specific topic studied, which must be researched by the student,
is also included. Pictorial material based on the syllabus is supplied at the
examination, and the examinee must identify
and interpret this.


Sculpture in the Antique Societies
Through academic work within the module's disciplines, the student will acquire the following:

Knowledge:
• Overview of fundamental methods used in the research of Greek and Roman sculpture of the period 1000 B.C. up to and including Constantine the Great
• Knowledge of the sculpture of various periods in public, private and religious arenas, as well as knowledge of sculptors, techniques, workplaces, quarries, regional characteristics and issues such as the function of sculpture and state-sponsored and portrait production
• Knowledge of the development and form of Greek and Roman sculpture

Skills:
• Skills in evaluating a material relic in relation to a written account
• Skills in placing a given sculpture in the correct period and context
• Skills in producing a synopsis
• Correct use of technical terminology related to the study of antique-era sculpture
• Ability to use a written account in relation to the study of sculpture

Competencies:
• Skills in the communication of academic information and academic issues
• Ability to use a synopsis as the basis for a verbal presentation
The module consists of the following exam(s):
1. Sculpture in the Antique Societies
Aim:
In the evaluation of exam performance, emphasis is placed on the extent to which the student
• Has a general understanding of antique-era sculpture from its origin until Constantine the Great (circa 1000 B.C. to 337 A.D.).
• Can use specific archaeological methods such as stylistic analysis and dating criteria in relation to sculpture and portraiture
• Has knowledge of the use of written account in relation to sculpture.
Method of instruction:
Instruction is in the form of lectures with presentations, and dialogue based on course books and articles.
Language of instruction:
Danish
Course description:
The discipline covers key monuments from Greek and Roman sculpture from their origin until Constantine the Great (circa 1000 B.C. to 337 A.D.). Selected monuments are focused on along with specific methods related to antique sculpture in different periods. The topics covered include architectural sculpture such as cult statues, portraits, statuettes, votive reliefs and grave monuments and both religious and private arenas. In addition to general methods, focus is on sculptors, techniques, painting, bronze casting, work places, quarries and functions, regional characteristics and assessment of written accounts.
METHODS OF EVALUATION
1.
Examinees Product Scope of product Duration Preparation Materials permitted Basis
Individual Combined written and oral. Elective topic 20 minutes
Usual Defence
Note
Entry for the the examination requires active (including written and
verbal presentations), regular and satisfactory participation in the
teaching (min. 75% of the
available lessons).
Students choose a topic and produce a synopsis, which is used
as the basis for the examination, in association with
the instruction.
The duration of the oral examination is 20 minutes including evaluation.
A syllabus of 1000 pages in length is set by the instructor. Literature
relating to the specific topic studied, which must be researched by the student,
is also included.


Elective Subject ('Hum-fag')
The module consists of the following exam(s):
1. Elective Subject ('HUM-fag')
Aim:
Method of instruction:
Language of instruction:
METHODS OF EVALUATION
1.
Examinees Product Scope of product Duration Preparation Materials permitted Basis
- - -


-
2.
Examinees Product Scope of product Duration Preparation Materials permitted Basis
- - -


-
Note

Elective subject (HUM fag) is a multidisciplinary humanistic elective study option available to all
humanistic bachelor students across all degree programmes.
A given semester's range of elective subjects is registered by the respective
boards of study for approval by the dean before being published
in the Aarhus University course descriptions catalogue 1 year prior to commencement of the
course. Detailed stipulations regarding each individual option's form,
content and examination format are stated in the individual
course descriptions in the catalogue.

Detailed guidelines for application, prioritisation and
enrolment in the elective subject are set out on the Faculty of Humanities'
web page
(http://humaniora.au.dk/uddannelse/undervis/humfag/ ).




Topography and Architecture in the Antique Societies
Through academic work within the module's disciplines, the student will acquire the following:

Knowledge:
• Broad knowledge of Greek and Roman architecture and topography, such as city-states, shrines, types of building, techniques, functions, the relationship between topography and architecture, working procedures, and the significance of architecture for its society
• Knowledge of key features of the topography of cities and shrines, with emphasis on ancient Athens, Olympia and Delphi; Rome, Ostia and Pompeii
• Understanding of inter-cultural issues in their topographical contexts in religious, private and public arenas
• Knowledge of the development of Ancient Greek and Roman architecture

Skills:
Correct use of relevant academic terminology in relation to the study of antique-era architecture
• Skills in assessing ancient Greek and Roman buildings and social development
• Source-critical skills in relation to material archaeological relics and written accounts
• Sound knowledge of contextual archaeology, i.e. placing of a monument into an overall social context with the help of written accounts
• Skills in the methodologies applied in association with the discipline
• Skills in the identification of Greek and Roman building types, and in in evaluating their architectural development based on building technique and style

Competencies:
• The ability to reproduce a verbal presentation in written form
The module consists of the following exam(s):
1. Topography and Architecture in the Antique Societies
Aim:
In the evaluation of exam performance, emphasis is placed on the extent to which the student
• Has acquired knowledge of key features of the topography of cities and shrines, with emphasis on ancient Athens, Olympia and Delphi; Rome, Ostia and Pompeii
• Has knowledge of the development of Greek and Roman architecture
• Can correctly describe and analyse monuments
• Uses relevant terminology
• Has acquired the ability to date objects correctly, and knowledge of contextual archaeology, i.e. placing of a monument into an overall social context
Method of instruction:
Instruction is in the form of lectures, with exercises and dialogue based on course books and articles. Students give a verbal presentation, which is then reproduced as a written assignment
Language of instruction:
Danish
Course description:
The student is introduced to Greek and Roman topography and architecture from the Geometric period until Constantine the Great (circa 1000 B.C. to 337 A.D.). In addition to the origin of architecture and stylistic development, emphasis is on selected cities and states such as Athens, Olympia, Rome, Ostia and Herculaneum/Pompeii; as well as various types of building, exemplified through key monuments from within the various periods; architecture in the Roman provinces is also included. The role of architecture and other questions will also be looked at in relation to monuments such as the Parthenon, the Temple of Athene in Priene, the Domus Aurea and the Pantheon. In association with study of the monuments, emphasis is placed on methodology and overall issues such as topographical contexts, dating criteria, function, materials, quarries, working procedures, measurement systems and technical details. Written accounts such as the works of Vitruv and Pausanius will also be included.
METHODS OF EVALUATION
1.
Examinees Product Scope of product Duration Preparation Materials permitted Basis
Individual Written Elective topic

Usual Submission
Note
Entry for the the examination requires active (including written and
verbal presentations), regular and satisfactory participation in the
teaching (min. 75% of the
available lessons).
A syllabus of 1000 pages in length is set by the instructor. Literature
relating to the specific topic studied, which must be researched by the student,
is also included. The exam consists of a written home assignment on a topic of own choice of max. 15
pages.


Individually Chosen Theme
Through academic work within the module's disciplines, the student will acquire the following:

Knowledge:
• Knowledge of an interdisciplinary theme
• Knowledge of overall entities and contexts
• Knowledge of the significance of monuments in relation to a historical, social perspective

Skills:
• Skills in dealing with different groups of archaeological material
• Skills in theory and methodology in analysing different contexts
• The ability set different monuments into perspective in relation to each other
• The ability to treat monuments within their context
• The ability to deal with different categories of archaeological material
The module consists of the following exam(s):
1. Individually Chosen Theme
Aim:
In the evaluation of exam performance, emphasis is placed on the extent to which the student
• Documents an in-depth knowledge of the studied topic and the central issues related to it
• Is comfortable with the use of academic literature
• Is able to structure work on, and communicate about, and archaeological material and its context  
Method of instruction:
Instruction is in the form of lectures, with exercises and dialogue based on course books and articles. Students give a verbal presentation in class, which is later submitted as a written assignment.
Language of instruction:
Danish
Course description:
Emphasis is placed on a methodological introduction to one aspect of Greek-Roman culture and the overall issues associated with it, or a specified cultural context. The interdisciplinary theme can focus on:

• Selected regions, localities or cultures, e.g. Asia Minor or the Etruscans
• Selected topics or groups of materials, e.g. numismatics, large-scale art, theatre or town planning.
METHODS OF EVALUATION
1.
Examinees Product Scope of product Duration Preparation Materials permitted Basis
Individual Written Elective topic

Usual Submission
Note
A syllabus of 1000 pages in length is set by the instructor. Literature
relating to the specific topic studied, which must be researched by the student,
is also included. The exam consists of a written home assignment on a topic of own choice of max. 15
pages.


Primary View

Through academic work within the module's disciplines, the student will acquire the following:

Knowledge:
• An in-depth knowledge of the studied topic
• A wide-ranging knowledge of various types of monument groups
• An in-depth knowledge of issues related to chronology, methodology and theory

Skills:
• Skills in the theory and methodology related to monument analysis
• Skills in the use of the various analytical methods and resources of the subject
• The ability to set different monument groups and cultural areas into perspective
• The ability to use the various analytical methods and resources of the subject

Competencies:
• The ability to identify and categorise different types of material relic within a cultural and historical context

The module consists of the following exam(s):
1. Primary View
Aim:
In the evaluation of exam performance, emphasis is placed on the extent to which the student
• Documents sound knowledge of the key features of the period in question
• Demonstrates the correct methodological approach to the subject matter
• Demonstrates sound use of the analytical methods of the subject
• Has the ability to set different monument groups into perspective
Method of instruction:
Instruction is in the form of lectures, exercises and dialogue based on course books and articles.
Language of instruction:
Danish
Course description:
In this discipline, students are trained in the categorisation of antiquities from the history of Greek and Roman art. The instruction takes the form of a series of exercises based on a defined period, e.g. the Archaic period in Greece or the early Roman Empire. An object, either the original or in picture form, is issued, and the student places the object in its correct context through description, style analysis classification and an overall knowledge of material relics. Emphasis is placed on the methodological approach of the student to the material, as well as the student's ability to place the object into a broader context.
METHODS OF EVALUATION
1.
Examinees Product Scope of product Duration Preparation Materials permitted Basis
Individual Oral Set examination 40 minutes
None Presentation
Note
Syllabus of 1500 pages, of which one half is set by the instructor, and
one half by the individual student. In the examination, a number
of syllabus-based questions are set, based on an
original object or pictures.


Bachelor’s project
Through academic work within the module's disciplines, the student will acquire the following:

Knowledge:
• An in-depth knowledge of the chosen academic material and issue

Skills:
• Skills in archaeological working procedures, methods and analysis techniques
• Skills in research
• Skills in the analysis and illustration of a defined archaeological material
• Skills in the written presentation of an academic subject matter

Competencies:
• The ability to independently structure and assess a given body of information
• The ability to critically assess an academic issue and the theories associated with it.
The module consists of the following exam(s):
1. Bachelor’s project:
Purpose
In the evaluation of exam performance, emphasis is placed on the extent to which the student:
• Has acquired a sound knowledge of basic archaeological methods such as description, classification and analysis, and is able to place monuments in their cultural and historical contexts
• Has acquired sufficient competencies in archaeological methodology and theory to be able to independently illustrate a small amount of archaeological subject matter, or an archaeological or multi-disciplinary issue, as well as an understanding of what should be included in a scientific project.
Method of instruction:
The instruction is based on lectures, dialogue and supervision.
Language of instruction:
Danish
Course description:
Students are given an introduction into some of the general prerequisites for Bachelor's projects. The project itself is then devised in consultation with the supervisor.
METHODS OF EVALUATION
1.
Examinees Product Scope of product Duration Preparation Materials permitted Basis
Individual Written Elective topic

Usual Submission
Note
The final hypothesis is agreed upon with the supervisor no later than 30 days before the
date of submission. The Bachelor’s project
must include a summary in English or German of maximum 1
page in length. The academic content of the assignment carries the
most weight in the assessment, but the summary is also taken into account.
If the Bachelor’s project is written in a foreign language, except
for Norwegian or Swedish, the summary must be in Danish. Scope:
max. 20 pages per student excluding summary.




4. Procedural provisions of the academic regulations
Regulations relating to the 1st year examination
The student must sit for the 1st year examinations before the end of the first year and the examinations must be passed before the end of the second year; see sections 25-22 of Executive Order No. 857 of 1 July 2010 on university examinations (Examination Order), The Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=132698).
If the 1st year examination has not been passed by the end of the first year, the student can register for a new examination in August, and the student must be advised of the result of this examination before the end of September.
Credit and flexibility
The Board of Studies may approve credit from a Danish or foreign institution of higher education; see section 35 of Executive Order no. 857 of 1 July 2010 on university examinations (Examination Order), The Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=132698 and section 72 of Executive Order no. 814 of 29 June 2010 on Bachelor's and Master's degree programmes at universities (Education Order), The Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=132698. Written application stating reasons for credit must be submitted to the Board of Studies. Applications must be written on the application form available at http://www.au.dk/da/adm/indskriv/skema.htm
Examination: registration and withdrawal
Registration for examinations is via the self-service for students, see http://www.au.dk/en/students.htm
For more information on examinations and procedures for registration and withdrawal see the university’s examination guidelines at http://www.au.dk/en/rules/2006/au1.

Registration for a course involving one or more exams automatically results in registration for those exams under section 27(1) of the Examination Order. It is the student's responsibility to ensure that registration for examinations has been done correctly. Registration can be checked via the student's self-service facility until the deadline for registration has passed.
Spelling and written expression
The assessment of all written exams, regardless of the language in which the exam is conducted, includes the assessment of the following:
- the student’s mastery of spelling and written expression. Spelling and written expression are taken into account in the assessment of the student’s overall performance.
- the student’s ability to present and support an academic argument.
- the student’s ability to structure an academic written assignment and to comply with formal academic requirements.

The assessment of all oral exams, regardless of the language in which the exam is conducted, includes the assessment of the following:
- The student’s ability to present an academic subject and structure an oral presentation. Oral presentation skills are taken into account in the evaluation of the overall performance.
- The student’s ability to participate in a substantive academic dialogue.
Rules for major written assignments:
Requirements regarding the length of written assignments are stated in the description of individual classes.
Standard page sizes are always expected in written assignments. A standard page is considered to be 2400 characters including spaces. To calculate standard pages, both text and notes are included, but not the front page, table of contents and bibliography.
Written submissions that do not comply with these requirements cannot be accepted for assessment.
Rules regarding the use of personal computers in examinations
For the university’s regulations regarding the use of computers in examinations, see http://www.au.dk/en/rules/2002/au6
Project-oriented coursework
The option of project-oriented coursework is described in the descriptions of individual classes.
Exemptions
An exemption is a deviation from the regulations that normally apply for the case in question. Exemption can be granted on the basis of an application sent to the authority that has the power to grant such exemption.
An application for exemption must be submitted to the Board of Studies. If another authority has the power to grant exemption, the Board of Studies forwards the application to the appropriate authority (e.g. the dean, rector or ministry).
An application for exemption must be made in writing, stating reasons, and submitted as soon as possible. For the application to be processed immediately, it must include a precise account of the regulation from which exemption is sought, and what such exemption is intended to achieve (e.g. permission to use special aids, extension of examination time, or postponement of time limits). Documentation for the exceptional circumstances that justify exemption must be enclosed with the application. Undocumented conditions can not normally be taken into account.
Appeals and complaints
Complaints must be submitted to the Board of Studies. It is a prerequisite for immediate processing that the complaint is made in writing, stating reasons. The complaint must state both the cause of the complaint and what the complainant expects to achieve.

Complaints regarding examinations must be submitted no later than 14 days following the release of the examination results, cf. the Examination Executive Order no. 857 of 1 July 2010 regarding university degree programme examinations, Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, section 8, see https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=132698
Re-examinations
Following an application from the student, the Board of Studies may grant permission for re-examination or make-up examination during the same exam period for exams that are not part of the first-year exam.

When applying for make-up examination a doctor’s certificate must be enclosed. A doctor’s certificate constitutes the necessary, though not always sufficient, prerequisite for being granted permission for a make-up examination.

The exact rules regarding the way and extent to which a student must have participated in the teaching in the case of participation-based examinations can be found under the description of the individual study elements.

Acts and executive orders on education can be found under the university's rules and regulations at http://www.au.dk/en/rules